The Old Curmudgeon

These are my writings, letters to the editor, and thoughts all gathered in one place.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Georgia Tech Grad. Veteran. Retired, Writer.

Monday, August 22, 2011

The Danger in Perry's Plans

Sometimes you hear political campaign rhetoric and you recognize it for what it is and go back to your normal train of thought and life. But, there are times when you can’t get it out from under your skin, know the danger of it, and slowly but surely watch the pot boil. Well, after long study and consideration of Gov. Rick Perry’s platform, the pot has boiled. One has to look into the devious suggestions he is making in his book Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America From Washington and being accepted by so many non-thinking followers who do not see the reasons behind his disastrous ideas and how one plays upon the other. Please read and understand.

1-End the direct election of senators by repealing the Seventeenth Amendment. The original Article One, Section 3 of our Constitution calls for the Senate to be composed of two from each state [chosen by the Legislature] for six years. In April 1913 the Seventeenth Amendment was ratified giving the right for the election to the U.S. Senate to be accomplished by the people of each state. This was meant to be an additional freedom granted to the citizens of the states, who had the right to choose their own Senators.

So why does Rick Perry want to trample on this American freedom of our casting a ballot? Only one reason can be found. For the past 50 years it is a fact that traditionally state legislatures have been Republican dominated, especially in rural, southern and Midwestern states. If one can control those houses, who now will choose the U.S. Senators, you will have a guaranteed permanent Republican Senate Majority in Washington. More on this as we go along.

2-Abolish lifetime tenure for federal judges by amending Article III, Section 1. If one reads American history they will find and understand that one of the fears of the populace and Constitution framers was the possibility of the courts to become politicized and be accountable to the powers that ruled the country. Examples of this can be found in all European history. As a result, it was decided by the writers of the Constitution and reaffirmed by the individual states that “The Judges , both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.” This would allow for true respect for the law even though there are times when many of us disagree with the judgments they hand down. To change this part of the Constitution would do two things:

a-Put politics back into the choosing of a justice so very often, even though we have to admit their initial choosing has become somewhat political. But once they are in, it’s over.
b-This would give Rick Perry’s idea of controlling the Senate thanks to state legislature approval a leg up on controlling the court politically by the Republicans opening the door for his religion based beliefs for America.

3-Congress should have the power to override Supreme Court Decisions with a two-thirds vote. He doesn’t understand what checks and balances are. Now when you consider points one and two above, it obviously becomes clear what a possible despot wants to do to our country and form of government.

The Constitution was carefully and beautifully written to allow for a system of checks and balances between the three branches of our government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) so that no one branch of this three headed beauty could rule the others. If the Congress passes a law the President does not accept he can veto it (check #1) and send it back to Congress. If the Congress disagrees with the President it can override his veto with a two-thirds vote of both houses (check #2.) The bill can also go to the Supreme Court for interpretation and final (somewhat) decision (check #3). If Congress is unhappy with the turndown by the court it can pass an Amendment with states’ approval and override the court (check #4.) All of this is meant to protect the citizens of the United States from demagoguery. And Perry wants to do away with it.

When you consider all three of these points of ignorance by Perry you can understand the danger to our freedom he is proposing. This also would open the door for his extreme right wing Tea Party points of Making Abortion illegal throughout the country and Changing the Constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman.

In other words, Perry wants all of America to live within his personal religious and political guidelines. I can’t help but think that King George must be rolling in his coffin laughing at his former colonials.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Rick Perry and his Phony Claims

Consider the Texas that Perry holds up to the rest of the nation for admiration. It has the fourth-highest poverty rate of any state. It tied with Mississippi last year for the highest percentage of workers in minimum-wage jobs. It ranks first in adults without high school diplomas. Twenty-six percent of Texans have no health insurance — the highest percentage of medically uninsured residents of any state. It leads the nation in the percentage of children who lack medical insurance. Texas has an inordinate number of employers who provide no insurance to their workers, partly because insurance rates are high, thanks to an absence of regulations.

Perry seems quite comfortable with the state’s lagging performance in what we might term the pursuit-of-happiness index. Consider his indifference toward education: In 2008, the state comptroller found that 12 percent of Texans lacked high school diplomas and that the level would rise to 30 percent by 2040 unless the state’s commitment to education was considerably increased. This year, though, when confronted with a $27 billion budget deficit, Perry did not raise taxes but instead slashed $4 billion from K-12 schools.

Wasn’t it Perry’s predecessor who introduced to the country “No Child Left Behind?

Yes, Rick Perry scares the hell out of me.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

More Not Serving Officials

Many also didn’t serve:
While Rick Perry is knocking Pres. Obama about not serving in the armed forces, I thought I might look at top present Republican current and past members of Congress:
Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-NC-did not serve, but endfangered American troops when visiting Iraq by violating serve:operational security.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY-did not serve.
Senate Asst. Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-MI-avoided draft and did not serve.
Senate Republican Conference Chairman, Jon Kyle, R-AZ-did not serve
Senate Republican Vice Chair John Cronyn, R-TX-did not serve
Nat’l Republican Senatorial Committee Chair, John Ensign, R-NV-did not serve
Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-OH-did not serve
House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-MO-did not serve
House Republican Conference chair Adam Putnam, R-FL-did not serve
House Republican Policy Committee Thaddeus McCotter, R-MI-Did not serve
Nat’l Republican Cong. Committee Chair Tom Cole, R-OK-did not serve

Other top Republicans who did not serve:Former NY mayor Rudy Giuliani-did not serve
Former Mass Governor Mitt Romney,-did not serve but served the Mormon Church on a 30 month mission
Former Senator Fred Thompson-did not serve
Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert-avoided the draft and did not serve
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey-avoided the draft and did not serve
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay-avoided the draft and did not serve
Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist-did not serve

And I’ll bet we could find the same thing on the Democratic side.

Old men are good at sending young men to die in wars.

Gov. Rick Perry of Texas has said that there is no way for Pres. Obama to be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces as he has never served in any of the branches of our troops. Of course he says this because he personally has served, and therefore pushing one of his individual assets, as he sees it. But, there is some interesting information about the past presidents of our country who have also not served in our armed forces, but distinguished themselves as Commander in Chief (aside from Barack Obama). The following did not serve:John Adams-But served as chairman of the Continental Congress Board of War.
John Quincy Adams-Witnessed the Battle of Bunker Hill (Michelle Bachman thinks that is in NH)
Martin Van Buren
Grover Cleveland
William Howard Taft-Sect of War 1904-1908
Woodrow Wilson-Pres. During WWI
Warren G. Harding
Calvin Coolidge
Herbert Hoover
Franklin D. Roosevelt-But was Asst. Sec. of Navy during WWI
Bill Clinton
Then there are those with barely questionable service:James Madison-Colonel Virginia Militia-Did not see action
James J. Polk-Colonel Tennessee Militia-Did not see action
Abraham Lincoln-Captain Illinois Militia-Did not see action
Ronald Regan-Captain USAR-Did not see action-made army movies
George W. Bush-Fst. Lt Texas Air Nation Guard-Stateside service during Vietnam War (when he showed up)
Then there are big shot government peopleRichard Cheney-VP of USA-several deferments-“had other priorities”
John Ashcroft-Former Atty. Gen.-seven deferments to teach business education at SW Missouri State
Jeb Bush-Former Florida Governor-Did not serve
Karl Rove-avoided draft-did not serve
Newt Gingrich-Former Speaker of House-avoided draft-did not serve
So it would seem that Rick Perry is way out of line and too impressed with his own service.